Stable Numerical Solution of an Elliptic PDE Inverse Problem Subject to Incomplete Boundary Conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/wjcms.432

Abstract

This paper addresses the inverse problem of reconstructing complete steady-state solutions for elliptic partial differential equations when boundary information is incomplete a situation common in electromagnetic, thermal, and geophysical modeling where full Dirichlet or Neumann data are not available. The objective is to develop a numerically stable and reproducible method that reconstructs the interior field and missing boundary trace from partial boundary measurements contaminated by noise. To that end, the inverse task is posed as a Tikhonov-regularized optimization problem in which the unknown Dirichlet trace on the unobserved boundary segment minimizes a least-squares discrepancy between forward-model predictions and boundary observations; the forward PDE is discretized by the finite element method and the gradient of the discrete cost is computed via the adjoint-state method, enabling efficient computation independent of the number of boundary parameters. The optimization uses a nonlinear conjugate-gradient scheme with automated L-curve-based regularization selection. Numerical validation on synthetic test cases including a unit-square Poisson problem and a circular-domain example shows that the proposed approach recovers the interior field and the missing boundary trace with low RMSE and small relative L^2 errors for noise levels up to 5%, whereas unregularized reconstructions suffer severe noise amplification. These results demonstrate that the FEM + adjoint + H¹-Tikhonov methodology provides a practical and stable solution approach for elliptic inverse problems with partial boundary conditions, and that this approach scales to moderate resolution meshes and is potentially extendable for non-smooth targets, nonlinear PDEs, and realistic measurement models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bertero, M., Boccacci, P., & De Mol, C. (2021). Introduction to inverse problems in imaging. CRC press.

[2] Bretin, É., Kacedan, E., & Seppecher, L. (2025). Multi-parameter identification in systems of PDEs from internal data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17562.

[3] Burman, E., Cen, S., Jin, B., & Zhou, Z. (2025). Numerical Approximation and Analysis of the Inverse Robin Problem Using the Kohn-Vogelius Method. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07370.

[4] Ciofalo, M. (2022). Solution of an inverse heat conduction problem with third-type boundary conditions. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 175 , 107466.

[5] Demkowicz, L. F. (2023). Mathematical theory of finite elements. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Dou, Z., & Song, Y. (2024). Diffusion posterior sampling for linear inverse problem solving: A filtering perspective. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.

[6] Fan, W., Hu, X., & Zhu, S. (2023). Modelling, analysis, and numerical methods for a geometric inverse source problem in variable-order time-fractional subdiffusion. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 17 (4).

[7] Habring, A., & Holler, M. (2024). Neural‐network‐based regularization methods for inverse problems in imaging. GAMM‐Mitteilungen, 47 (4), e202470004.

[8] Hamedani, E. Y., & Aybat, N. S. (2021). A primal-dual algorithm with line search for general convex-concave saddle point problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 31 (2), 1299-1329.

[9] Ham, S., & Kim, J. (2023). Stability analysis for a maximum principle preserving explicit scheme of the Allen–Cahn equation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 207 , 453-465.

[10] Hauptmann, A., Mukherjee, S., Schönlieb, C. B., & Sherry, F. (2024). Convergent regularization in inverse problems and linear plug-and-play denoisers. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 1-34.

[11] Huang, C., Wang, L., Fu, M., Lu, Z. R., & Chen, Y. (2021). A novel iterative integration regularization method for ill-posed inverse problems. Engineering with Computers, 37 (3), 1921-1941.

[12] Ji, K., Shen, Y., Chen, Q., Li, B., & Wang, W. (2022). An adaptive regularized solution to inverse ill-posed models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60 , 1-15.

[13] Kaltenbacher, B. (2024). Convergence guarantees for coefficient reconstruction in PDEs from boundary measurements by variational and Newton-type methods via range invariance. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44 (3), 1269-1312.

[14] Kirby, R. C., & MacLachlan, S. P. (2024). Extending Irksome: improvements in automated Runge–Kutta time stepping for finite element methods. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software.

[15] Lesnic, D. (2021). Inverse problems with applications in science and engineering. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Lima, S. A., Kamrujjaman, M., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Numerical solution of convection–diffusion–reaction equations by a finite element method with error correlation. AIP Advances, 11 (8).

[16] Métivier, L., & Brossier, R. (2025). On the adjoint state method for the gradient computation in full waveform inversion: a complete mathematical derivation for the (visco-) elastodynamics approximation. Geophysical Journal International, 240 (2), 942-966.

[17] Mohammad-Djafari, A. (2021). Regularization, Bayesian inference, and machine learning methods for inverse problems. Entropy, 23 (12), 1673.

[18] Morozov, V. A. (1966). On the solution of functional equations by the method of regularization. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 167 (3), 510-512.

[19] Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. (2006). Numerical optimization. Springer.

[20 ] Rodrigues, J. A. (2025). Solving Steady-State Elliptic Problems in Irregular Domains Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Fictitious Domain Methods. Research in Statistics, 3 (1), 2542577.

[21] Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992). Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 60 (1-4), 259-268.

[22] Tikhonov, A. N. (1977). Solutions of ill posed problems. Winston.

[23] Yismaw, N., Kamilov, U. S., & Asif, M. S. (2025, June). Covariance-Corrected Diffusion Models for Solving Inverse Problems. In 2025 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP) (pp. 26-30). IEEE.

[24 ] Yuan, C., Zhang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Direct Solution of Inverse Steady-State Heat Transfer Problems by Improved Coupled Radial Basis Function Collocation Method. Mathematics, 13 (9), 1423.

[25 ] Zhang, X. (2024). Generalized Tikhonov regularization method for an inverse boundary value problem of the fractional elliptic equation. Boundary Value Problems, 2024 (1), 80.

[26] Zhou, W., Zheng, Y., Pan, Z., & Lu, Q. (2021). Review on the battery model and SOC estimation method. Processes, 9 (9), 1685.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Mathematics

How to Cite

[1]
A. ALDNADOI, “Stable Numerical Solution of an Elliptic PDE Inverse Problem Subject to Incomplete Boundary Conditions”, WJCMS, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 10–25, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.31185/wjcms.432.