Evaluating End-to-End Delay in Road-Based Routing Protocols for VANETs with Snake Optimization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjcms.254Keywords:
End-to-End Delay (AEED), VANETS, Snake Optimization Algorithm (SOA), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR)Abstract
Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) require efficient routing protocols due to their dynamic network topologies and high mobility. This paper proposes a Road-Based Vehicular Traffic (RBVT), which combines reactive (RBVT-R) and proactive (RBVT-P) routing protocols to improved the performance. We evaluate the impact of RBVT on Average End-to-End Delay (AEED) by comparing it with existing protocols such as AODV, DSR, GPSR, OLSR, DSDV, and WRP. Furthermore, we integrate Snake Optimization Algorithm (SOA) with RBVT to optimize routing and reduce AEED. Simulations demonstrate that SOA-RBVT significantly reduces AEED compared to baseline protocols, especially in dense VANET scenarios.
Downloads
References
G. Husnain and S. Anwar, “An intelligent cluster optimization algorithm based on Whale Optimization Algorithm for VANETs (WOACNET),” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0250271, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0250271.
I. A. Abbasi and A. S. Khan, “A Review of Vehicle to Vehicle Communication Protocols for VANETs in the Urban Environment,” Future Internet 2018, Vol. 10, Page 14, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 14, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/FI10020014.
R. S. Rao, Seema, P. Singh, and S. A. Khan, “State of the Art VANETs Routing Protocols: A Literature Review,” International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 380–398, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33889/IJMEMS.2022.7.3.026.
“A Survey on Topology and Position Based Routing Protocols in Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET)”, Accessed: Jul. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.ijfrcsce.org
S. Sharma and P. Sharma, “Comprehensive study of various routing protocols in VANET,” 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems, ICCS 2019, pp. 1272–1275, May 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065878.
M. Obaidat, M. Khodjaeva, J. Holst, and M. Ben Zid, “Security and Privacy Challenges in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” Connected Vehicles in the Internet of Things: Concepts, Technologies and Frameworks for the IoV, pp. 223–251, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-36167-9_9.
S. Tarapiah, K. Aziz, and S. Atalla, “Analysis the Performance of Vehicles Ad Hoc Network,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 124, pp. 682–690, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2017.12.205.
M. Rizwan Ghori, A. Safa Sadiq, and A. Ghani, “VANET Routing Protocols: Review, Implementation and Analysis,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1049, no. 1, p. 012064, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012064.
P. Shah and T. Kasbe, “A review on specification evaluation of broadcasting routing protocols in VANET,” Comput Sci Rev, vol. 41, p. 100418, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.COSREV.2021.100418.
A. Srivastava, A. Prakash, and R. Tripathi, “Location based routing protocols in VANET: Issues and existing solutions,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 23, p. 100231, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.VEHCOM.2020.100231.
P. K. Shrivastava and L. K. Vishwamitra, “Comparative analysis of proactive and reactive routing protocols in VANET environment,” Measurement: Sensors, vol. 16, p. 100051, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MEASEN.2021.100051.
M. A. R. Abdeen, A. Beg, S. M. Mostafa, A. Abdulghaffar, T. R. Sheltami, and A. Yasar, “Performance Evaluation of VANET Routing Protocols in Madinah City,” Electronics 2022, Vol. 11, Page 777, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 777, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ELECTRONICS11050777.
F. Belamri, S. Boulfekhar, and D. Aissani, “A survey on QoS routing protocols in Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET),” Telecommun Syst, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 117–153, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11235-021-00797-8/METRICS.
J. Wu, M. Fang, H. Li, and X. Li, “RSU-Assisted Traffic-Aware Routing Based on Reinforcement Learning for Urban Vanets,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 5733–5748, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2963850.
R. Ramamoorthy and M. Thangavelu, “An enhanced hybrid ant colony optimization routing protocol for vehicular ad-hoc networks,” J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 3837–3868, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S12652-021-03176-Y/METRICS.
I. A. Aljabry and G. A. Al-Suhail, “Iraqi Journal for Electrical and Electronic Engineering A Simulation of AODV and GPSR Routing Protocols in VANET Based on Multimetrices,” vol. 17, 2021, doi: 10.37917/ijeee.17.2.9.
W. Zheng, Y. Ai, and W. Zhang, “Improved Snake Optimizer Using Sobol Sequential Nonlinear Factors and Different Learning Strategies and Its Applications,” Mathematics 2024, Vol. 12, Page 1708, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1708, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/MATH12111708.
L. gang Kong, B. Wang, D. jin Fan, S. Shi, X. Ouyang, and M. Xu, “Optimize photovoltaic MPPT with improved snake algorithm,” Energy Reports, vol. 11, pp. 5033–5045, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.EGYR.2024.04.064.
W. Zheng, S. Pang, N. Liu, Q. Chai, and L. Xu, “A Compact Snake Optimization Algorithm in the Application of WKNN Fingerprint Localization,” Sensors 2023, Vol. 23, Page 6282, vol. 23, no. 14, p. 6282, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/S23146282.
N. M. Saravana Kumar, P. K. Pagadala, V. Vijayakumar, and A. Kavinya, “Multi Objective Glow Swarm Based Situation and Quality Aware Routing in VANET,” Wirel Pers Commun, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 879–895, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S11277-022-09582-5/METRICS.
F. A. Hashim and A. G. Hussien, “Snake Optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm,” Knowl
Based Syst, vol. 242, p. 108320, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2022.108320.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanadi Hassan karim Al-Maliki, Hamid AL-Asadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.