Internet of Robotics Things (IoRT) Based Integration of Robotic Applications for Advanced Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjcm.Vol1.Iss1.4Keywords:
Internet of Things, Internet of Robotic Things, IoT integrated Robotics, Robots in IoT EnvironmentAbstract
IoT and robotics industries are united to create the Internet of Robotics Things (IoRT). IoRT is the idea of intelligent machines monitoring the environment around them and using local and distributed intelligence to decide on courses of action and making decisions accordingly. IOT is a network of devices that are connected to the internet, including devices and equipment connected by sensors. These elements are essential for businesses trying to drive customer facing innovation, data-driven decisions, new applications, digital transformation, business models and revenue streams. Robots need to maintain great flexibility to react to unexpected conditions. AI helps these robots to deal with any unforeseen circumstances. Robotics and Simulation are key elements in the solutions of advancing manufacturing and production. Many people often think of IoT and robotics technologies in separate fields but they have been getting increasingly close in recent years. The In this way, such processes are used to avoid the loss of human life and the automation of processes which need high performances. Robotic and simulated application have been successfully deployed to functions in real world scenarios that man will not be able to accomplish such as study of volcanoes, and space center on its own. Furthermore, the robotic implementations give robots the opportunity to efficiently and safely function in the adverse conditions without being injured physically.
References
H. Ahmadi, G. Arji, and L. Shahmoradi The application of internet of things in healthcare: a systematic literature review and classification, 2018.
A. S. Albahri, A. A. Zaidan, and O. S. Albahri, “Real-time fault-tolerant mhealth system: comprehensive review of healthcare services, opens issues, challenges and methodological aspects,” J Med Syst, vol. 42, pp. 137–137, 2018.
O. C. Ann and L. B. Theng, “Human activity recognition: a review,” IEEE international conference on control system, computing and engineering, pp. 389–393, 2014.
M. Bal, W. Shen, and Q. Hao, “Collaborative smart home technologies for senior independent living: a review,” 15th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD), pp. 481–488, 2011.
R. Bogue Robots to aid the disabled and the elderly, 2013.
S. Brownsell and M. Hawley, “Fall detectors: do they work or reduce the fear of falling?,” Hous Care Support, vol. 7, pp. 18–24, 2004.
C. Buttorff, T. Ruder, and M. Bauman, Multiple chronic conditions in the United States. 2017.
L. M. Camarinha-Matos, F. Ferrada, and A. I. Oliveira, “Care services provision in ambient assisted living,” IRBM, vol. 35, pp. 286–298, 2014.
B. G. Celler, T. Hesketh, and W. Earnshaw, “An instrumentation system for the remote monitoring of changes in functional health status of the elderly at home,” 16th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp. 908–909, 1994.
M. C. F. Medicare and Services US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2017.
M. Chan, D. Esteve, and C. Escriba, “A review of smart homes-present state and future challenges,” Comput Methods Programs Biomed, vol. 91, pp. 55–81, 2008.
S. Chen, J. Lach, and B. Lo, “Toward pervasive gait analysis with wearable sensors: a systematic review,” IEEE J Biomed Health Informatics, vol. 20, pp. 1521–1537, 2016.
G. Chiarini, P. Ray, and S. Akter, “mHealth technologies for chronic diseases and elders: a systematic review,” IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, vol. 31, pp. 6–18, 2013.
S. Coradeschi, A. Kristoffersson, and A. Loutfi, “Towards a methodology for longitudinal evaluation of social robotic telepresence for elderly,” Human robot interaction, 2011.
M. N. Dakurah, C. Koo, and W. Choi, “Implantable bladder sensors: a methodological review,” Int Neurourol J, vol. 19, pp. 133–141, 2015.
C. Elena-Lenz Internet of things: six key characteristics, 2014.
M. J. Grant and A. Booth, “A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies,” Health Inf Libr J, vol. 26, pp. 91–108, 2009.
E. Jaul and J. Menzel, “Pressure ulcers in the elderly, as a public health problem,” J General Pract, vol. 2, pp. 174–174, 2014.
N. Kalid, A. A. Zaidan, and B. B. Zaidan, “Based-real time remote health monitoring systems: a review on patients prioritization and related "big data" using body sensors information and communication technology,” J Med Syst, vol. 42, pp. 30–30, 2017.
P. Khosravi and A. H. Ghapanchi, “Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: a systematic literature review,” Int J Med Informatics, vol. 85, pp. 17–26, 2016.
B. Klimova, Mobile health devices for aging population groups: a review study. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 HM Verma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
