Implementation Patterns of AquaSim for Simulation of Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/wjcm.Vol1.Iss1.11Keywords:
Wireless Sensor Networks, Wireless Acoustic Networks, Underwater Sensor NetworksAbstract
Now days, a number of corporate as well as social applications are connected with wireless technologies which are covered under the domain of Internet of Things (IoT) and Cloud of Things (CoT). To work with the development and implementation of these scenarios, there is need of high performance costly gadgets which are difficult for the self finance researchers and small organizations. To cope up with the financial aspects of developing and getting the results from advanced wireless environment, the use of simulators and software libraries is done. In wireless environment, the segment of Underwater Wireless Sensor (UWSN) or Underwater Acoustic Network (UAN) is quite prominent which are used for the underwater applications including Military, Naval and Underwater Surveillance. Underwater sensor networks are famous for researchers and engineers in wireless technology. This field offers a lot of academic work in different disciplines. The main challenge of this UWSN is the energy saving for sensor nodes. For this cause, the location of sensor nodes shifts about regularly. There are several algorithms for energy production and collection, but this area is still in need of study due to political and national security concerns.
References
G. Cujilema, D. Avila-Pesantez, A. A. Aucancela, and G. E. Figueras-Benitez, “Evaluation of Nodes Location Mechanisms in Underwater Wireless Sensor Network using Aqua-sim NG,” 2020 IEEE Engineering International Research Conference (EIRCON), pp. 1–4, 2020.
R. Martin, S. Rajasekaran, and Z. Peng, “Aqua-Sim Next generation: An NS-3 based underwater sensor network simulator,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems, pp. 1–8, 2017.
P. Saxena and A. K. Sharma, “Simulation & Analysis Of AODV & DSDV Routing Protocols in Underwater Wireless Sensor Network Using Aqua-SIM Network Simulator,” International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, 2017.
G. Cujilema, D. Avila-Pesantez, A. A. Aucancela, and G. E. Figueras-Benitez, “Evaluation of Nodes Location Mechanisms in Underwater Wireless Sensor Network using Aqua-sim NG,” 2020 IEEE Engineering International Research Conference (EIRCON), pp. 1–4, 2020.
A. T. Hakim, A. P. Dewi, D. Perdana, and C. N. Kurnaman, “Energy Consumption Analysis of DBR and VBF Protocols in Underwater Sensor Networks Using Aqua-Sim at Network Simulator 2,” Jurnal Infotel, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 170–177, 2018.
M. Jafri, S. Balsamo, A. Marin, and R. Martin, “Implementation of depth-based routing and its enhancement in AquaSim-Next Generation for underwater wireless sensor networks,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 3714–3714, 2018.
E. Hemalatha, M. Dhamodaran, and E. Punarselvam, “Robust Data Collection with Multiple Sink Zone in 3-D Underwater Sensor Networks,” International Journal on Applications in Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2019.
A. Khasawneh, M. S. B. A. Latiff, O. Kaiwartya, and H. Chizari, “A reliable energy-efficient pressure-based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor network,” Wireless Networks, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 2061–2075, 2018.
J. L. Banluta, L. D. Balbuena, N. M. C. Tiglao, and J. R. I. Pedrasa, “Comparison of contention-based MAC protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks,” 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pp. 518–523, 2017.
S. N. Pari, M. Sathish, and K. Arumugam, “An energy-efficient and reliable depth-based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor network (ER-DBR),” in Advances in power systems and energy management, pp. 451–463, Springer, 2018.
M. Jafri, A. Marin, A. Torsello, and M. Ghaderi, “On the optimality of opportunistic routing protocols for underwater sensor networks,” Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pp. 207 215, 2018.
V. R. Prakash, V. B. Geo, R. Vijayasarathi, and G. Vimalarani, “Exploiting Localization Capability and Packet Transfer at Intermediate Nodes for Underwater Sensor Networks using Simulations,” 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), pp. 223–227, 2020.
A. P. Das and S. M. Thampi Fault-resilient localization for underwater sensor networks, vol. 55, pp. 132–142, 2017.
M. Ahmed, M. Salleh, M. I. Channa, and M. F. Rohani, “RMEER: Reliable Multi-path Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network,” International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 2088–8708, 2018.
I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges,” Ad hoc networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257– 279, 2005.
P. Xie and J. H. Cui, “R-MAC: An energy-efficient MAC protocol for underwater sensor networks,” Wireless Algorithms, Systems and Applications, pp. 187–198, 2007.
J. Heidemann, W. Ye, J. Wills, A. Syed, and Y. Li, “Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking,” Wireless
Communications and Networking Conference, vol. 1, pp. 228–235, 2006.
I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks,” ACM Sigbed Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 3–8, 2004.
H. Yan, Z. J. Shi, and J. H. Cui, “DBR: depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks,” in NETWORKING 2008 Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Wireless Networks, Next Generation Internet, pp. 72–86, Springer, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Asst.Prof.Dr.Karim Hashim Kraidi Al-Saedi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
